If you're building a business beyond the $2 million mark, you know the growth playbook by heart: referrals, digital marketing, a sales pipeline that needs constant feeding, and margins that get squeezed every time a competitor discounts. What most business owners don't realise is that the largest, most transparent buyer in the country is sitting in plain sight, and most of your competitors are ignoring it too.

In 2024–25, Australian Government procurement hit a record $104.9 billion. That's the Commonwealth alone. Across the federal and six state and territory award sources tracked in our own contract database, we identified at least 81,771 contract awards in FY24–25, roughly one new government contract every 6.4 minutes. NSW alone accounted for 3,407 of those award notices, worth $19.8 billion. Add the jurisdictions we can't yet count, plus private-sector tenders from miners, constructors, universities and large corporates, and tendering is arguably the biggest single sales channel in Australia. And unlike every other channel, this one tells you in writing what the buyer wants, how your offer will be evaluated, and precisely when to apply.

For businesses that do show up, it isn't a side hustle. The 2026 RFP Response Trends & Benchmarks Report, a global study of 1,533 companies by Loopio and the Association of Proposal Management Professionals (APMP), found that formal bids and tenders now influence 40% of company revenue on average among businesses that respond to them, the highest share recorded since 2019. For those companies, tendering isn't a channel. It's the engine.

So why do so many capable businesses never bid? Usually one of three beliefs. All three are out of date.

"It's rigged for the big end of town"

Here's a number that surprises almost everyone: in 2023–24, small and medium enterprises won 52 per cent of Commonwealth contracts by volume. More than half of everything the federal government signed went to a business with fewer than 200 employees.

The dollars are a different story, in 2024–25, the SME share of contract value slid to just 14 per cent, as mega-contracts over $20 million swallowed 72 per cent of all federal procurement value. But before you conclude the game is rigged, look underneath: micro-businesses actually won 15 per cent more contracts than the year before. The count keeps rising; it's a handful of billion-dollar deals, ones no SME was ever going to bid on, skewing the value.

And forget the image of tendering as billion-dollar defence deals. In our database of last year's awards, 92 per cent of contracts with a known value were under $1 million, and three in four were under $250,000, squarely SME territory. Meanwhile, the gap between that 14 per cent value share and the government's own commitments, at least 25 per cent of procurement value to SMEs for contracts up to $1 billion, and 40 per cent for contracts up to $20 million, is turning up the pressure on buyers, who are now measured on SME participation. That much daylight between where the numbers sit and where buyers are required to take them is called an opportunity.

"We don't have a bid team"

Neither do most of the businesses that are winning. Globally, the average bid team is eight people, but small businesses routinely respond with a fraction of that, completing tenders in an average of 27 hours against the 39 hours enterprise teams take. What separates winners from the rest isn't headcount. It's method: reading the criteria properly, answering the question actually asked, evidencing every claim, and never missing a compliance item.

Method is learnable, and increasingly, it's built into technology. The same global research found that four out of five bid teams now use AI somewhere in their response process, and purpose-built bid platforms now walk first-time responders through steps that used to require a seasoned bid manager. The playing field is flatter than it has been in decades.

And newcomers are walking onto it constantly. In FY24–25, 23,474 different suppliers won at least one contract in our database, and for more than 8,600 of them, it was the first win visible anywhere in our contract history. New names appear on the winners' list every single week.

"Tenders are slow"

This one is fair, up to a point. The average tender response takes 33 hours of work from receipt to submission, and government decision cycles test everyone's patience. But look at the return on those hours. The average responding business wins 39% of the bids it submits, and the best-run teams win more than half. Ask your sales team what percentage of cold outreach converts, and tendering starts to look less like a slow channel and more like a patient one.

Then consider what a win is actually worth. Contracts are frequently multi-year. Incumbents are well placed at renewal. And one anchor government or blue-chip client transforms your credibility with every other buyer you'll ever pitch. Slow, yes. Compounding, absolutely.

The real reason most businesses don't bid

It's not laziness and it's not incapacity. It's that the first tender feels overwhelming: unfamiliar portals, compliance schedules, selection criteria written in bureaucratic dialect, and a deadline that seems designed to punish the unprepared. So most businesses either never start, or submit something rushed, lose, and conclude that "tendering isn't for us."

But a losing first bid isn't evidence that the channel doesn't work. It's evidence that you attempted it without a process, and process problems are the most solvable problems in business. In the next two articles in this series, we'll look at how the tendering game is being rewritten by AI on both sides of the table, and exactly what the teams who win more than half their bids do differently.

There is more than $100 billion a year on the table from the Commonwealth alone, a government under real pressure to hand more of it to businesses your size, and a moment of technological change that has lowered the barriers to entry further than they've ever been. The only question is whether you'll be at the table, or watching a competitor take the seat.

---

Scryve, Powered by Tender Relief, will be at The Business Show, ICC Sydney, 25–26 November, stand B472. If you've ever wondered whether your business could win government or corporate contracts, or you've bid before and been burned, come and talk it through with our team. Bring your questions; we'll bring the map.

Sources: AusTender FY2024–25 procurement data; Department of Finance, Statistics on Australian Government Procurement Contracts (2023–24); Tender Relief contract database covering federal (AusTender) plus NSW, NT, QLD, SA, TAS and WA award sources, FY24–25; 2026 RFP Response Trends & Benchmarks Report, Loopio in partnership with APMP.